I'm looking for a more consise way to sort a block of objects. Where you can sort a block of blocks based on the numeric position of the values to compare, there's no such shorthand for comparing objects by a given field:
test-data: reduce [ object [name: "A" value: 1] object [name: "B" value: 3] object [name: "C" value: 2] ]
One solution would be to extend the native
SORT function to accept a
WORD! argument corresponding to the object field. However, that would require an update to the language and might take a little while to be accepted.
I've sketched out the following
SORT-BY function that would take either a word (for the object field) or a block (an expression that is applied to the object):
sort-by: func [series [block!] comparator [block! word!]][ forskip series 2 [ insert series either word? comparator [ all [ in series/1 :comparator get in series/1 :comparator ] ][ use [object] compose [ object: first series (comparator) ] ] ] sort/skip series 2 head forall series [remove series] ]
It's not idealxe2x80x94it iterates through the block pulling the respective value from each object and adding it to the block; sorts the block; and removes the value again.
sort-by test-data 'value sort-by test-data 'name sort-by test-data [object/value] sort-by test-data [sine 50 * object/value]
Any thoughts on the approach, particularly economy? Or even the need for such a function...
Obviously is lacking a descending/ascending switchxe2x80x94implied in future revision.